"No man is punishable or can be lawfully made to suffer in body or goods except from a distinct breach of the law established by ordinary courts of the land." A V Dicey
(Except in LibDem run Stockport)
Mr. Parnell, the Town Hall protester, adopted two girls from Stockport Council. The girls had been placed with Stockport Council for adoption by Wigan council. They had had a terrible time with their birth parents. When they were first adopted they were receiving counselling from After Adoption.
Despite receiving over £600,000 to provide such services, the Council subsquently refused to fund the counselling.
Mr. Parnell asked the Council to re-
What had this man done? Asked the LibDem Council for counselling for his two daughters adopted from Stockport Council. These are the LibDems who pontificate their belief in human rights!
They accused him of assault with a sneeze. He was found guilty and sent to Forest Bank prison, despite being in very serious ill health.
When this case finally went to appeal at the Crown Court in a 3 day hearing which cost you and me tens of thousands of pounds, the security guards were found to have lied in court, the Assistant Chief Executive of Stockport Council failed to turn up in court. The police said they contacted him about 9 times asking him to attend but he didn't bother to return their calls or emails. Judge Bernard Lever said: "When Mr Ged Lucas was asked to appear before this court he ran for the hills.
I have today 10th November 2012 at 18.17 sent this to Peter Jones, senior council officer responsible. I don't actually have any confidence that Mr. Jones will do the decent thing. I might be surprised, but I doubt it:-
Recovery Team Manager
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
Tel : 0161 474 5824
Mobile: 07891 949107 ( 88 9107 from internal phones)
Fax : 0161 474 5827
Dear Mr Jones,
I have taken expert advice on this matter and say to you the following:-
This is a litany of non-
I look forward to your comments as to how this disgraceful situation can be sorted out and shame on you, Mr Jones, that it has not been done before. You have my letter of authority to act on Mr. Parnell's behalf and I shall put any response from you, or lack of one, up on my website, which is getting a surprising number of visits.
From: MICHAEL PARNELL <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: sheilaoliver <email@example.com>
Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012, 3:14
Subject: Fw: Reporting to the Police Reply
Mike here, Hello how are you, hope you are well,
the liberal security democratic protecters have done it again, so that i couldn't ask a question at the full council meeting last thursday 8th November 2012, they had the police arrest me at 14:23 hrs for a section 4A public order offence and was forcefully put on conditinonal bail (
Derbyshire, Weldon, Hogg, Candler, Pantall, Smith, White, Boylan, Schulz, Roberts, Khan, Majothi, Jones, Webb -
This council was responsible for the stories above and below. The serious case reviews led to guarantees that the council would assist people who came to them for help with vulnerable children. With the town hall protester, although they had a legal duty to help him, they repeatedly sent him -
You and I paid possibly hundreds of thousands of pounds in police, prison, court and appeal court time over this alleged assault with a sneeze. The Council security guards were found to have lied in court. Although acquitted of the assault with a sneeze, the control order remained in force. How anyone can continue to be punished for a crime of which he was acquitted is beyond my understanding, but that is what happened.
Mr. Parnell is acquitted in a 3 day appeal at Manchester Crown Court of assault with a sneeze. The security guards were found by Judge Bernard Lever to have lied in court over the alleged assault with a sneeze.
In Mr Parnell's own words:-
This was taken while I was waiting outside the town hall ready for a council meeting that I had been summonded to attend. The council had aleady reported me to the police that day for being stood outside Stopford House (yes, for being outside). The police moved me on and I went for a coffee at Macdonald's, after which I came back for the meeting, was told 5.30 was too early, and I had to wait outside until 5.50. I stood outside with a blank, A4 laminated piece of paper in front of me to shield my camera from the traffic dust, but not from the disgusting filth of Council Security. Do they want to put me down? Sorry but I have to say this -
In Mr. Parnell's own words:-
Mike here. I am trying hard to get many more of the video clips to you but my PC is not coping very well. If it was a person you could say it might be having a nervous breakdown. The virtual memory keeps failing; this means I have to shut down and restart -
"It was in 2008 that (then) Home Secretary Jacqui Smith announced that the Police would be rolling out these tactics on the estates to combat "anti-
"Where do we go from here?
We have seen how concentrated police harassment affects not only our own social movements, but also the communities of the past and the present. We also have an idea of the forces at work behind policing -
Why is there a banning letter signed by Council Solicitor, Barry Khan, when Mr. Parnell has at no time committed any crime or been shown to have been abusive or threatening?
The Council had a legal duty many years before this incident to sort out help for his daughters. This was when Mark Hunter, Lib Dem MP, was Leader of the Council. Andrew Stunell, MP, Mr. Parnell's local MP also refused to assist him. Why? Was Mr. Stunell keen to cover up abuses committed by his political cohorts? Why would he not intervene when he could have done and was paid to do to help his constituent who desperately needed his help. Why did I have to try to help Mr Parnell, for which I was subjected to an abusive attitude by Mr. Stunell?
In Mr. Parnell's own words:-
To explain what it is all about, on the evening of 14th April 2009 Stockport Council advertised the Standards Committee meeting to be held at 6 o'clock in the Town Hall. It was my intention to attend this meeting and I did arrive in good time for it. The management of the Town Hall instructed me that they did not know of this meeting that night. I directed them to their own noticeboard outside, which advertised the said meetting. They apologised that it must have been cancelled or was being held at a different venue, and if I had any problems I should put them to the Council's Solicitor. As I had met with the solicitor before, Mr Barry Khan, and on other occations we have had conversations while walking to his car, I know where he usualy parks, and so I checked to see if he was still in work. His car was there, so I went to his office to contact him over the meeting and the request I wished to submit. I attended the building -
Mr. Parnell's own words:-
Do the police under commuinity protection have a duty to investigate local authorities data breaches, because if they do, it is that they then knew that what I had shown, and as yet no one here has ever been brought to task.
Mr. Parnell's own words:-
Please view the attached file it contains a video clip recording of the reporting to a GMP Stockport Division police officer, the breaches towards the public under legislation within Data Protection Act by the actions of Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council.
Stockport Council security guards are plotting to kick the f*ck out of Slovakian supporters at Wembley!!!!!
Again, the Council Security guards plotting against foreign football supporters.
Stockport Council security guard slaps the back of a Council manager's head!!!!
Stockport Council security guard tells a completely innocent counciltaxpayer:-
Recording of an assault on innocent Town Hall protester -
At no time has Mr. Parnell been found guilty of any aggressive behaviour and the council holds no evidence of any such behaviour on his part or that evidence would have been shown in court.
The Council Leader, past and present Chief Executive, all the LibDem Executive Councillors were made fully aware of what was being done to this gentleman. They merely sneered and did things like trying to have him arrested for trying to raise questions in council meetings about his treatment, or for trying to leave council meetings before the end.
This case demonstrates the total contempt in which the LibDem councillors and LibDem MPs at Stockport hold Mr Parnell's human rights.
Mr. Parnell's day.
Standing outside Stockport Town Hall for 2 years all day long. Exchanging cheery greetings with passers-
Every day those LibDem Executive councillors passed him on the Town Hall steps. He went to every meeting to try to get them to do something about his plight. What did they do? They kept on persecuting him.
Why didn't the Leaders -
Was there some sort of Masonic back-
Mr. Parnell didn't commit the assault with a sneeze. He was acquitted after the council security guards were found to have lied in court. Why then did the restraining order remain in place? Barry Khan, Council Solicitor, was fully aware of this miscarriage of justice, yet continued to have Mr. Parnell persecuted, including having him arrested three times over one weekend alone for trying to report a Data Protection Act breach by the Council which was putting him at serious risk of fraudulent use of his identity.
If Mr. Khan doesn't understand the law or has no respect for it, then he shouldn't be Stockport Council Solicitor.
Mr. Parnell was acquitted in January 2010 of the assault with a sneeze for which he has given the restraining order, so why has he 5 breaches (each carrying a possible prison sentence of 5 years) in February and March 2010?
Is Barry Khan a fit person to hold public office as Council Solicitor? He was fully aware of this miscarriage of justice and compounded this injustice many times over in the following years?
Are the LibDem Executive councillors fit to hold public office? Is the Chief Executive? They were all made fully aware of what was being done to this innocent gentleman, who only ever peacefully asked for counselling help for his troubled daughters adopted from Stockport Council.
Why would Mr. Parnell be in 5 breaches of a restraining order in 2010 when he was acquitted of the crime of assault with a sneeze when the council security guards lied in court?
Why would he get a restraining order placed upon him when the charges of assault against him raised by the council security guards who threaten to kick the f*cking heads in of foreign football supporters were dismissed?
What on earth has Barry Khan, Council Solictor, been doing in allowing this appalling miscarriage of justice to continue?
Why did Mr Parnell's local LibDem MP -
Is Mr Khan a fit person to hold the position of Council Solitictor at Stockport if he is wilfully blind or worse an instigator of this abuse?
Mr. Parnell got the restraining order for this assault, of which he was acquitted and council security guards lied in court.
Why did the Leader of the Council send me this sensitive information about another council taxpayer when at that time there was no functioning authority in force for me to act on Mr. Parnell's behalf?
Why wouldn't the Council's Complaints Team deal with this breach of the Data Protection Act?
The Leader says:-
"I hope you will forward this information to your media friends, if you don't be assured I will."
Why is the Leader of Stockport Council continuing to pursue his vendetta against this completely innocent man -
I raised this matter with the Chief Executive of Stockport Council, and Mr Anwar Majothi, Complaints Officer, but in all this they found nothing wrong at all.
I have to question whether Mr Boylan or Mr Majothi are fit people to hold public office.
Why did the Crown Prosecution Service refuse bail for this innocent, very sick, peaceful protester? Why did the Leader of the Council send me a CPS copy of his bail notice? Why did no-
I posted the Town Hall Protester details up on the What Do They Know site with his full permission. I did this in a desperate attempt to stop a man driven to attempt suicide by these heartless officials from being repeatedly sent to prison and being hounded for council tax arrears which he simply did not owe.
I got my legs slapped by the What Do They Know website team, but this man is completely innocent of any crime. I had to do my utmost to prevent this horrific abuse of him and his lovely family from continuing.
The town hall protester owes no council tax arrears (I have seen his electronic council tax records held by SMBC), yet they keep hounding him and sending in the bailiffs for money he doesn't owe. They remove money paid for later years to pay off non-
It is well recognised in law that Magistrates Courts are often not impartial places; certainly not in Stockport.
Please see above the complete hash the Council has made of his council tax. If he were to try to access Citizens Advice as is his human right, he would be arrested and subjected to 5 years imprisonment for an ASBO imposed on him for a crime of which he was acquitted and the accusations of assault were found by the court to be lies.
Barry Khan, Council Solicitor, knew all this. I told him. Why did he allow this deplorable situation to continue? Is he a fit person to hold public office?
A litany of non-
I hope Mr. Jones will "recover" some order into this matter.
It is impossible to get complaints dealt with at Stockport Council under Khan, Majothi, Derbyshire, Schulz, Boylan et al. However serious they are -